Posts Tagged ‘Christianity’

A Strangely Isolated Place

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

The Freedom of Choice Act is not pro-choice. At this point I hope all people supporting Obama understand that he is pro-ABORTION. I hate to sound so single issue but seriously 3500 babies are killed every day in the US and Obama wants to increase this number. That’s like 7 million babies since the start of the war in Iraq. and nobody seems to care cuz Obama is the hip, cool vote. Es absurdo! qué pena

I like to imagine that one day, before the alien takeover, most of our more nutty citizens will move to Alaska and be our secesh neighbors of the northwest. In their own country, they squeeze all of the abortion, socialism, liberalism, nipples, Jews, Satan, gays, masturbation, and vegan cookbooks out of the minds of their youngins.

The same goes for the current crop of “Libertarian” whiners of which, from his Facebook updates, singer/songwriter Jude seems to be a part:

McCain finally won a debate, but Obama can never lose. The real losers are any of us left with Libertarian tendencies…

There may be whispering small-l-libertarians on my shoulders and the shoulders of most self-efficacious adults; but, we shouldn’t be under the illusion that our libertarian beliefs are shared by the people whom we repeatedly send to Washington to do something.

These do-something-ners are always going to find a way to find a way to do something. And if that means creating more departments of we-gotta-save-you-all-from-yourselves and hiring more do-something-ners , they’ll find a constituency who will be dramatically supportive.

My point is, haggling over marginal issues, like the barely-moving tax rate and the pureness of a politician’s Christianity, is a lot like drinking Bud Light: You get louder and louder until you pass out and forget everything that happened. If you really want “change,” you’ve got to “get out there” and make a good impression. By their nature, whiners and self-declared losers don’t impress. It’s the reason why Obama, a black man from an underprivileged family, has done so well.

Divinity is Claimed

Monday, July 28th, 2008

In a move that will surely be feverishly condemned by the Dominionism sect, the Catholic Church has released the New Community Bible, a bible that is meant to spread religious propaganda throughout India through the subversion of Indian traditions. Jeremy Page covers:

“I am sure this Bible, made in India and for Indians, will bring the word of God closer to millions of our people, not only Christians,” Oswald Gracias, the Archbishop of Bombay, said at a ceremony on the Bible’s release.

Produced by the Society of St Paul, the Bible is the first in this nation of 1.1 billion to be written in simplified English. It features 27 sketches of typical Indian scenes: one shows a family in a slum beneath skyscrapers. Mahatma Gandhi and Mother Teresa also feature in lengthy notes interpreting the text for Indian readers.

The notes even quote Hindu scriptures, such as the Ramayana and Mahabharata epics, to help to explain Christianity to prospective converts. “We wanted to show the parallels between the themes in the Bible and in Indian religions,” Father Tony Charanghat, a spokesman for the Archbishop, said. “We’ve put the sacred text in a local context.”

Edward Gordon Edition

Sunday, April 6th, 2008

On second thought, this isn’t very funny. It’s actually quite frightening:

The family was gone, and we were just waiting on the funeral home to come and pick it up. When you’re alone with a corpse in a room, you suddenly realize how the corpse resembles all the other objects in the room. In other words, the corpse is just like the furniture. It has become human furniture.

Then it struck me: this is what atheists think we all are. The corpse is just a material object and nothing more. According to atheism, we are all just like the corpse: we are just material objects.

Once you believe that about human beings, you can do anything to them. Though we treat the corpse with respect for the sake of the family, we really don’t have to for any other reason. It’s just a show. You can’t respect a corpse anymore than you can a chair. A corpse is an object.

Ultimately, though atheists know they don’t dare admit it, this is the inevitable consideration atheism gives to all humanity. This is where the atheistic influence is dragging us all. If I’m wrong, all I ask is that you show me.

Edward Gordon is a Christian fundamentalist who operates Christian Cross Talk, a blog “dedicated to encouraging Christians in their faith and fighting the spiriutal [sic] war against the influence of atheism in our society.”

As we all well know, Christians have been fighting “spiritual wars” since Christianity had the backing of a state treasury. Without fail, the ultimate purpose of these wars was to extend the power of a state by claiming another state’s resources. Religion was used to grease the gears of the war machine. You were promised that, if you died in war, you would bypass those 1000 agonizing years in purgatory and go straight to heaven. This bears complete resemblance to the Islamic promise of 80,000 servants and 72 wives.

I mention this because Mr. Gordon believes:

As for the National Christian Church, we still believe that is something we need, but we don’t believe it is something that should be linked to a secular government. Better, we must advocate for a unification of denominations among all churches in the body of Christ.

A centralized Christian behemoth could fund a great war against, well, everything. Unfortunately, Mr. Gordon, who probably fantasizes about being emperor, believes he is able to and can successfully think like an atheist. But, when you read through his posts you find that Mr. Gordon is channeling his own sociopathic thoughts onto a minority about which he understands nothing. We psychology people refer to this as projection.

Take, for instance, the post Promises in the Dark. Mr. Gordon begins with this illogical proposition:

Atheists deny that consciousness is anything more than an illusion produced by the mind, and it cannot control the brain. Therefore, they must believe we have no free will over the physical circumstances that push us around. Without free will there can be no love.

What follows is a bizarre caricature of a psychopath. The psychopath is an atheist. In Mr. Gordon’s mind, the two are interchangeable. This is a great example of a condition that seems to be prevalent in religious circles: the unintegrated ego. Like a child, Mr. Gordon still views the world in terms of “all good” and “all bad.” All Christians are, ultimately, all good and should unify in their goodness under God. All atheists are, ultimately, all bad and are unified in their badness under Satan.

To minimize the cognitive dissonance created by the knowledge that he is capable of great harm, Mr. Gordon projects his own evil onto the minority upon which it is currently most popular to project (Jewish people, Black people, and gay people could say a thing or two about projection). This way, if anything goes wrong, he can blame the atheists. And, if he should accept some blame, he can say that the wrong committed by the atheists is malicious and large relative to the well-intentioned and minimal wrong committed by him.

This is an example of closed-loop processing. Mr. Gordon is always right and, if he’s wrong, he’s never as wrong as those damned atheists. I assume he ends his posts with a “prove me wrong” type statement or question in order to receive comments at which he can shake his head and believe that they don’t meet his standards of proof.

If, unlike Mr. Gordon, you are legitimately seeking an explanation regarding the differences between a theist and an atheist, this is the only answer you’ll ever need:

“normal” theist: “What a lovely day. Praise God for it!”
“normal” atheist: “What a lovely day.”

Mein Gott ist ein überwältigender Gott.

Sunday, January 13th, 2008

Darwin’s theory of evolution helped fuel the rise of Hitler and contributed to the school-shooting massacre at Columbine, a former St. Petersburg City Council member wrote in a letter urging the Pinellas County School Board to expose students to alternative theories.

“Evolution gives our kids an excuse to believe in natural selection and survival of the fittest, which leads to a belief that they are superior over the weak,” Bill Foster wrote board members in a letter received this week. “This is a slippery slope.”

He continued: “One of the Columbine shooters wrote on his Web site, ‘You know what I love? Natural selection! It’s the best thing that ever happened to the Earth. Getting rid of all the stupid and weak organisms.’”

Dear Bill Foster,

We are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls… We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity… in fact our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of our own people.

- Adolf Hitler, in a speech in Passau, 27 October 1928

On becoming an atheist.

Tuesday, November 20th, 2007

I was born and baptized into the Catholic Church. My mother was a devout Catholic. We attended church every Sunday as well as the Stations of the Cross, the extraordinary holiday masses, and the many other types of services. Although I was an altar boy for nearly a decade, I never really had “faith” as it is viewed from a Christian perspective: The Catholic orthodoxy stressed commitment and loyalty to the Church itself.

I first noticed the misguidedness of this dogma when my age group was preparing for the sacrament of confirmation. It was incessantly preached that this ritual marked a mature and decisive commitment to the Church. No longer were we to behave like the teenager we were. Among the confirmees was an assortment of teenagers who, like teenagers, did not take the confirmation process seriously. Yet, much to my dismay at the time, they were confirmed and, except for those holiday masses that everyone attends, they never returned to participate in the weekly drudgery.

In 1994, my family and I moved to Delaware. For some reason I began attending a predominantly Southern Baptist school named Christian Tabernacle Academy. The school and church had an active and boisterous group of youth and I enjoyed singing the catchy I-love-Jesus and we-are-God’s-soldiers hymns during the Monday services. It was a unique and inspiring experience.

However, being Catholic came with an enormous stigma. I was ostracized and bullied by my peer group every school day. I was even condemned to hell twice by a teacher. The history book blamed all of histories miseries on the Catholic Church and never mentioned, for instance, that Martin Luther didn’t like Jews. Over time, my anger at the sheer ridiculousness of my treatment rose and I began to wonder, “Is this what it mean to be a Christian?”

To answer that question, I may have been drawn deep into the Baptist orthodoxy. It was made clear to me that their path was the only path to eternal salvation. The proverbial straw came when I brought in a book on cults to read during my daily free period. First, my classmates became upset and told me that we were not allowed to know the information presented in the book. Second, my teacher-a man who believed that listening to patriotic country music is a Godly endeavor and frequently argued with another teacher who believed that God considers all things secular, including secular music, sinful-confiscated the book. Finally, he gave it to the principal who looked it over and told me that I was never to bring it in again.

I’ll just say that I was a bit peeved. Who was he to tell me that there are some things that I’m not allowed to know? After that, I no longer considered Christianity to be a worthy endeavor. Not only did they argue over ridiculous ideological minutia and actively encourage bullying, they tried to stop me from reading a book. Who does that? And. at that age, even if I had no desire to do something, if I was told “no” I was sure as hell going to do it.

Eventually, my academic pursuit led me to college where I drank a lot and met a few folks who were honest and genuine and others who were largely unimpressive. The honest and genuine folks did not profess a symbiotic relationship with God. They were firmly planted in the humanistic side of intelligentsia. It was the Christian youth who shunned everyone who even slightly disagreed with them.

Eventually, I had a middle-of-the-night revelation that I was no longer Catholic and that I didn’t believe in heaven or hell. After that, I thought, “Well, what now?” Some time later, I understood that I was an atheist and that I was mentally and emotionally free to roam without the specter of eternal damnation on my shoulder. Up until then I had not understood that sin wasn’t my prison-mine was the pursuit of a sinless soul.

I had been taught in Catholic school that a soul is stained by sin much like a white shirt is stained by just about everything. If a soul were to become too stained, I would become physically decrepit and emotionally paralyzed. Only the sacrament of confession could clean the soul. After my conversion, I realized that that is a bunch of hooey. If I can act with free will and am responsible for myself, I’m ultimately accountable to myself.

I had been angry at religion and no one in particular for a long time. I was angry at my treatment, angry at the hypocrisy, and angry that I had no one to talk to about my journey. Unfortunately, my parents were completely unequipped to help me with my dilemmas. When I was in high school, I was involved in something benign that my parents didn’t understand. So, after they talked to some police officers, they forced me to stop participating because they believed that I was literally worshiping Satan. And so, they’ve remained far from my closest confidants and, frankly, I don’t care to burden them with questions of faith.

By the end of my journey I had learned a valuable lesson that has guided me since. All persons of ideology, regardless of denomination, faith, or common denominator, can be abusive, cruel, sadistic, greedy, power hungry, depressed, lonely, detached, and, most notably, wrong. We are all cut from the same cloth. We isolate those of us who need companionship and love when we become so damn attached to an ideology that we forget our mortality and fallibility. Rigid “good versus evil” and “us verses them” dichotomies plague all ideologues. They believe that they have a lock on all that is good and moral and that those people over there in that corner, or in that restaurant, or in that country are evil and amoral. They’ll never understand that that sort of thinking damages and dooms the rest of us. But, hey. They, like all of us, are only human.

Within the miserable mindset of nicotine withdrawal, I contemplate the seeds of a revolution.

Saturday, November 17th, 2007

This post is in response to an email regarding the PBS Nova program “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design On Trial” that I received from my good friend Michael. After watching the program, I was excited and, rightfully so, he questioned my optimism. Specifically, he asks “[H]ow do you think we will avoid war? Who are those of “cool” disposition, and how much of our discourse do they control, as opposed to war hawks and religious fundamentalists? I would like to hear how the U.S.’ current theory of presidential powers prevents one of those of vocal minority to do as he pleases? Does our current theory of presidential power prevent anything?” My answer follows.

After the program, I was excited for three reasons. First, the program was an excellent expose of the underhanded approach that Intelligent Design advocates employ. I found it satisfying that a program finally had the decency to reveal those Christian fundamentalists and absolutists who willingly commit sins against their god in a misguided belief that they have been forced to sin in order to do their almighty’s will.

Second, the program defined science and theory in clear terms and acknowledged that those who would wrest power from a benign group of biologists must muddy the lexical waters in order to claim parity. Hence, in Newspeak, “science” and “theory” are fluid terms and the meanings that have been ascribed by generations of academics have been lost. It’s clear to me that certain sectors in society have long associated and will forever associate the current conception of religion with “good” and the current conception of science with “bad.” So, any program that poignantly exposes this lexical mischief should be celebrated.

Third and finally, the findings prove that an impartial observer, one who is an expert on neither religion nor science but the law, will correctly determine the outcome of the aforementioned debate using a rational and scholarly method. As though a judge should ensure that both parties leave the courtroom fairly content and partially hopeful, one of the chief complaints about Jones’ ruling that Intelligent Design is not science and that it is the “progeny of creationism” is that he goes “too far.” You take these criticisms to heart, I know. Unfortunately, a judgment declaring Intelligent Design science and irreducible complexity valid is the only action about which the Intelligent Design advocates could have experienced even a modicum of contentment.

As for the content, I do agree that, when viewed with an “Intelligent Design has achieved parity” mindset, the program is one-sided. If the judge had ruled that Intelligent Design surpasses evolution as both a science and a theory and the producers had decided to allot equal time to both, Intelligent Design advocates would mindlessly squawk on-and-on about how the equal time subverts the truth and about how “Darwinists” are losers. On the other hand, an honest assessment would conclude that the program’s intended purpose, to explain how the judge reached his decision and to present a summary of the aftermath, was readily achieved.

Now, onto the meat of your email, your invocation of Sam Harris is interesting. I almost fully disagree with his infamous “Science Must Destroy Religion” essay. Religion will exist as long as “misery” and “suffering” reside in our vocabulary. Atheism offers neither hope nor comfort to those who believe that life is truly awful. Aside from offering the wonderful and individually-conceptualized reward of soulful bliss, religion offers a code of conduct that prescribes the actions one must undertake in order to achieve personal satisfaction through the bringing of happiness and safety to others. Current fundamentalists and absolutists passionately believe that misery and suffering will never be eradicated unless secularism and its precepts are eradicated.

In this regard, religion is extremely influential. It is its pinnacle of economic acridity. Thousands of people, who misguidedly believe that their contributions will bestow great blessings upon them, tithe daily. Though I cannot refute Harris’ central thesis that an investment in science will provide more tangible blessings to more people, the placebo effect that is produced by acting upon faith remains valid.

Subsequently and throughout history, the moods and behaviors of a people within a state have been determined by the leaders of the state’s foremost religion. Constantine chose religion in order to consolidate his power amongst his people for this very reason. The encouraging news about this religion-as-institution condition is that Christianity and Islam arose from within. Religion-as-institution naturally produces misery and suffering and its inevitable outcome is the production of its most subversive element–the one that must precede orthodoxical revolution–contra-interpretation.

In this phase of American history, religion-as-institution is, overwhelmingly, the most favored governmental paradigm and, subsequently, “war is peace” is the most favored foreign policy. Soft war (dissemination of misinformation and the beginnings of economic sanctions) with Iran has already begun. And, because, like Constantine, the current President of the United States sees no distinction between the resources of his state, the resources of his will to do good, and the resources of his god, hard war with Iran is likely. Congress and the people lack the will to stop this because that which will be lost by becoming subversive far exceeds that which will be lost by espousing modern jingoistic ideals.

Those who are of a legitimately “cool” disposition will likely arise from within this religion-as-institution fire. From my experience with the Catholic Church, the most caring and personable priests have atheistic tendencies. When the Church causes misery and suffering, those priests who have maintained enough of a distance from the dogma can compensate those who find themselves disenfranchised.

To wit, all I am able to do now is speculate upon those events that will produce a critical mass of those subversive elements necessary for orthodoxical revolution. An external effect such as terrorism does not produce an immediate result. Likewise, an internal effect such as the bad decision that an agent of the state will make in response to an external threat does not produce an immediate result. It is a slow bleed and the vocal minority can only grow over time. I do believe that a hard war with Iran will substantially speed up this process. However, boiling the water too quickly can cause the people to accept a 1% token while the state retains 99% of its former self. Still, it is a loss and, I conclude, let the state expend its resources and continue its self-destruction because that 1% may be the largest return to the people that I will see in my lifetime.

Passion and Politics

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

Throughout the past 18 years, the Republicans have thoroughly succeeded in embracing three issues: abortion, flag burning, and Christianity. These three issues are supported by three fervently passionate groups who share a common theme of being disfranchised by the Supreme Court. Abortion is considered a privacy issue. Flag burning is protected by the First Amendment. School sponsored prayer and prayer in school have been eradicated.

Because of the Supreme Court decisions, these three groups view themselves as marginalized do-gooders. They are ideologically similar in that each group believes that America is currently on the wrong path and that their legislation is the Pepto for the ills of the nation. This passion unites the membership within these groups. On the other hand, their counterparts do not exist at the same level. There is no fervent “pro-abortion” group (pro-choice is hardly the same), no fervent pro-flag burning group, and no atheistic anti-Christian conspiracy (atheists account for only 3% of the population).

The passion and the unbalance make these issues politically “no lose” platforms. This November, Republican senators will run on anti-abortion, anti-flag burning, and anti-gay marriage platforms and legions of anti-whatever voters will show up and vote Republican. It does not matter if the anti-whatever measure comes to fruition. The Republican senators are nearly assured reelection and “judicial activists” are to blame.

These once marginalized groups (and healthy doses of gerrymandering) have enabled Republicans to retain control of the government for the past six years. Unfortunately, this has led to constant attacks on what we once considered freedoms. For example, Terri Schiavo exercising her state-granted right to die is considered murder. (I will never forget watching coverage of the Schiavo spectacle and witnessing an interview with a young woman who claimed “I have tons of friends in persistent vegetative states.”) The free press has been labeled treasonous. Liberal beliefs have been demonized. Nearly everyday, democrats are called godless terrorist sympathizers and have their deaths advocated. Republican senator (and former doctor) Bill Frist has lied about the effectiveness of contraception on national television.

There are two themes present in the above examples: (1) It is the republicans who encourage and maintain these attacks. (2) In doing so, the republicans control the language that surrounds any debate on these issues. Murderous. Treasonous. Godless. Terrorist. Unworthy to live. This excoriating vocabulary was once considered “fringe” and maintained only by self-loathing politicians. With the advent of the saturating-media and the embracement of the three aforementioned groups, this vocabulary is now commonplace. Republicans have succeeded in conferring mainstream status to fringe and uncompromising elements. The power and the “above the law” lifestyle that Republican politicians currently enjoy is infinitely more important the personal freedoms of the citizenry.

I believe that the freedoms that are readily dismissed by the three aforementioned groups are the core of humanity:

  1. Adults have authority over their bodies.
  2. Adults may express their feelings using nonviolent means.
  3. Adults must be free of laws that preference the orthodoxies of one religion so they may worship any god and practice any religion their soul desires.

Freedom, independence, and autonomy are rights upon which America was founded. So, please, stay out of my sock drawer and have a happy 4th.

St. Patty’s Day Is For Lovers.

Monday, March 14th, 2005

Yes, it is that time of year again when all the Mad Drunks claim their heritage from their Mother Country, Ireland. God help us! Yes, this Thursday is St. Patrick’s Day! You thought I might forget, but I probably have some Irish in me as well. It is just that the luck part has not shown up in a while. Of course, this St. Patrick’s Day will be different like last year’s. Last year, I was fired from Subway ended my strong career as a Sandwich Artist. I was not that heart-broken, but it was over putting two more olives than I was suppose to on a sandwich. Oh, darn! In either case, this one is different, because it is lacking one element: Where in the hell is all the green! That is right! Mother Nature is not a drunk and does not celebrate St. Patrick’s Day in New York, but all of the people do! All I can see is brown and white as far as the eye can see with exception of the weird pink house in the middle of Troy, NY! In the South, it may not be that green, but it was at least trying to be. It is like that sick joke where Greenland has no plants and Iceland does! Here, life in the form of plants is silent. I guess I will have to live with it!

In either case, the Capital Region is ready for another reason to get drunk! It shares it’s excitement by talking about it two weeks in advance. It is like Christmas, but without the traffic jam, unless it is in front of a liquor store. I got to find out about more facts of St. Patrick’s Day like the most Irish City other than in Ireland is Ocean City, MD. I can see that! They have lots of Bingo! 28% of population of Ocean City, MD is Irish. Does that not sound high? I always thought that Boston or Chicago would have beaten them by a long shot. Oh well! Shows what I know!

So what is the deal with St. Patrick’s Day, anyway? I am glad you asked! According to most people, St. Patrick was a saint, go figure, who ridded the island of Ireland of snakes. Thus, St. Patrick started the first pest control business! Well, without causing to many bar fights and revolutions, Skibicki Research has discovered that that idea is in fact wrong. Just hold your fire, until I get you more angry to blame someone else. The History Channel suggests that St. Patrick was, in fact, not even Irish! He was British! He was born there, and somehow captured by drunken Irish Raiders and taken to Irish prison for six years. This could be the first act of the IRA, but I could be mistaken. Somehow, after trying to leave the country, he stayed. The Irish whiskey and women probably got to him, so he lost all motivation to swim to Britain.

I can see some questions arising! So what about the snakes, and what is the deal with the shamrocks AKA clovers? Well, I will also have to break the bad news! There were never any snakes in Ireland to begin with. As for the shamrock, clovers were considered a holy plant representing the coming of Spring. It was also a way of showing Irish pride to piss off the British that were ruling at the time. Good job, guys! St. Patrick also may have used the Shamrock to describe the Trinity idea in Christianity. So after quite a walk, St. Patrick received messages from God, so he became a devote missionary. He liked to use metaphors! Metaphor: A description of something with the use of a similar object or idea used for better understanding. He used a lot of them. Snakes just happened to be Pagan Religions. He was respected for blending Christianity with the culture of the native Irish. So St. Patrick’s Day is a celebration of his death date on March 17th. In a way, that is depressing.

We seem to be skipping something?

Ah! How can we forget the little people! Leprechauns! Other than becoming one of the worst horror movie ideas in this century, leprechauns came from Detroit, I mean, Irish folklore as the word “lobaircin”, meaning small people. It came from Celtic belief in fairies. Of course, these were evil, self-centered fairies that constantly tricked people to keep them from their Lucky Charms cereal. It did not work, but you can’t say they did not try. Originally, leprechauns were never part of St. Patrick’s Day. You can thank Disney for that! So leprechauns became a permanent addition to St. Patrick’s Day. No wonder why they are grumpy! Can you imagine their drinking tolerance?

Anyway, I wanted to wish everyone a Happy St. Patrick’s Day in advance, because we know that you are not going to be sober enough to read! Just have fun and watch out for the leprechaun rap. It is horrible, and be careful!

Skibicki

P.S. Happy Birthday, Michael Slattery!