Rapids OneIcevineFeel Like A StrangerGreen LandFire WallPrint 3MeteorsPrint 2Drawing OneTurn On Your LovelightU!Severe Storm TwoDeep In The WoodsGrassflatsNighttime On River CityGuitarsNew York PathA Day Without BloodStormbringerJam
The Blasphemy Collection

The concept of blasphemy seemed for some decades to be in decline in the West, but not any more. It may be useful to look back at some recent cases of militantly religious outrage…

The article is here. What’s interesting about the list is that all art is, essentially, blasphemy. When something new is created, some religion somewhere is offended. Religious folk are often called conservatives for a reason.

But, what’s most interesting about the list is their treatment of all of the needless murders and deaths as simple components of a larger issue. Instead, they could consider them, I don’t know, blasphemies against humanity or something like that.

With that said.. On a lighter note,

hasanyoneseen.jpg

crop-circles.jpg

Mood: Wired

Lesson of the Day: Flonase + Eye = Tears

Music: Georgie James - Long Week

Mood: Tired

Lesson of the Day: I have got to stop taking pills that screw with my mood and my sleep. Not only do I admit that my mind is in a constant state of reading people and knowing people more than they mean to let on, but admitting so probably creeps them out. It’s not that I mean to, but the ones whom I do psychoanalyze are the ones whom I find fascinating and worthwhile. Oh well, c’est la vie.

Music: Elliot Smith - Pictures of Me

I’ll have to wait until Saturday to celebrate my thanksgiving. But, that’s all good. To celebrate, the only two thanksgiving day classics ever recorded are now on the media player playlist: Arlo Guthrie’s “Alice’s Restaurant” and Adam Sandler’s “Thanksgiving Song”.

For the uninitiated, make sure your sound’s on and simply click on the song you wish to hear.

Update: They play now. 

I was born and baptized into the Catholic Church. My mother was a devout Catholic. We attended church every Sunday as well as the Stations of the Cross, the extraordinary holiday masses, and the many other types of services. Although I was an altar boy for nearly a decade, I never really had “faith” as it is viewed from a Christian perspective: The Catholic orthodoxy stressed commitment and loyalty to the Church itself.

I first noticed the misguidedness of this dogma when my age group was preparing for the sacrament of confirmation. It was incessantly preached that this ritual marked a mature and decisive commitment to the Church. No longer were we to behave like the teenager we were. Among the confirmees was an assortment of teenagers who, like teenagers, did not take the confirmation process seriously. Yet, much to my dismay at the time, they were confirmed and, except for those holiday masses that everyone attends, they never returned to participate in the weekly drudgery.

In 1994, my family and I moved to Delaware. For some reason I began attending a predominantly Southern Baptist school named Christian Tabernacle Academy. The school and church had an active and boisterous group of youth and I enjoyed singing the catchy I-love-Jesus and we-are-God’s-soldiers hymns during the Monday services. It was a unique and inspiring experience.

However, being Catholic came with an enormous stigma. I was ostracized and bullied by my peer group every school day. I was even condemned to hell twice by a teacher. The history book blamed all of histories miseries on the Catholic Church and never mentioned, for instance, that Martin Luther didn’t like Jews. Over time, my anger at the sheer ridiculousness of my treatment rose and I began to wonder, “Is this what it mean to be a Christian?”

To answer that question, I may have been drawn deep into the Baptist orthodoxy. It was made clear to me that their path was the only path to eternal salvation. The proverbial straw came when I brought in a book on cults to read during my daily free period. First, my classmates became upset and told me that we were not allowed to know the information presented in the book. Second, my teacher-a man who believed that listening to patriotic country music is a Godly endeavor and frequently argued with another teacher who believed that God considers all things secular, including secular music, sinful-confiscated the book. Finally, he gave it to the principal who looked it over and told me that I was never to bring it in again.

I’ll just say that I was a bit peeved. Who was he to tell me that there are some things that I’m not allowed to know? After that, I no longer considered Christianity to be a worthy endeavor. Not only did they argue over ridiculous ideological minutia and actively encourage bullying, they tried to stop me from reading a book. Who does that? And. at that age, even if I had no desire to do something, if I was told “no” I was sure as hell going to do it.

Eventually, my academic pursuit led me to college where I drank a lot and met a few folks who were honest and genuine and others who were largely unimpressive. The honest and genuine folks did not profess a symbiotic relationship with God. They were firmly planted in the humanistic side of intelligentsia. It was the Christian youth who shunned everyone who even slightly disagreed with them.

Eventually, I had a middle-of-the-night revelation that I was no longer Catholic and that I didn’t believe in heaven or hell. After that, I thought, “Well, what now?” Some time later, I understood that I was an atheist and that I was mentally and emotionally free to roam without the specter of eternal damnation on my shoulder. Up until then I had not understood that sin wasn’t my prison-mine was the pursuit of a sinless soul.

I had been taught in Catholic school that a soul is stained by sin much like a white shirt is stained by just about everything. If a soul were to become too stained, I would become physically decrepit and emotionally paralyzed. Only the sacrament of confession could clean the soul. After my conversion, I realized that that is a bunch of hooey. If I can act with free will and am responsible for myself, I’m ultimately accountable to myself.

I had been angry at religion and no one in particular for a long time. I was angry at my treatment, angry at the hypocrisy, and angry that I had no one to talk to about my journey. Unfortunately, my parents were completely unequipped to help me with my dilemmas. When I was in high school, I was involved in something benign that my parents didn’t understand. So, after they talked to some police officers, they forced me to stop participating because they believed that I was literally worshiping Satan. And so, they’ve remained far from my closest confidants and, frankly, I don’t care to burden them with questions of faith.

By the end of my journey I had learned a valuable lesson that has guided me since. All persons of ideology, regardless of denomination, faith, or common denominator, can be abusive, cruel, sadistic, greedy, power hungry, depressed, lonely, detached, and, most notably, wrong. We are all cut from the same cloth. We isolate those of us who need companionship and love when we become so damn attached to an ideology that we forget our mortality and fallibility. Rigid “good versus evil” and “us verses them” dichotomies plague all ideologues. They believe that they have a lock on all that is good and moral and that those people over there in that corner, or in that restaurant, or in that country are evil and amoral. They’ll never understand that that sort of thinking damages and dooms the rest of us. But, hey. They, like all of us, are only human.

This is me contemplating giving up coffee (so I sleep better) and cigarettes at the same time:

headexplodebig.gif

Is it really day 5? Five days without a smoke. Fives days without looking over my balcony rail with a cigarette between my fingers. I’m still not entirely sure what the point of all of this is buuuut I think I can convince myself that never having to experience this withdrawal again is enough to continue.

These last few days have been physically challenging. My heart constantly beats hard. It’s a symptom I rarely experienced when I smoked. Also, I frequently feel the need to touch my lips and grind my teeth. If I hadn’t been a psych major I probably wouldn’t be mildly amused by these behaviors.

So, 5 days. And 5 days more. And my remaining 18,250 days. Base on past attempts, this is close to my “give up” point. But, fortunately, I still have my higher brain functions telling me “no.” If those go and I start coming up with ever-creative excuses to buy a pack,.. who knows. I think I may break out the construction paper and cutout a big NO! for my wall.

Now, I know I’m rambling, but this short post has been a good distraction. I think I’m going to drink some coffee and watch TV. Speaking of which, I’ve got to remember to bring the Starry Night and Pumpkin Spice coffees to work tomorrow. Seasonal coffee rocks.

This post is in response to an email regarding the PBS Nova program “Judgment Day: Intelligent Design On Trial” that I received from my good friend Michael. After watching the program, I was excited and, rightfully so, he questioned my optimism. Specifically, he asks “[H]ow do you think we will avoid war? Who are those of “cool” disposition, and how much of our discourse do they control, as opposed to war hawks and religious fundamentalists? I would like to hear how the U.S.’ current theory of presidential powers prevents one of those of vocal minority to do as he pleases? Does our current theory of presidential power prevent anything?” My answer follows.

After the program, I was excited for three reasons. First, the program was an excellent expose of the underhanded approach that Intelligent Design advocates employ. I found it satisfying that a program finally had the decency to reveal those Christian fundamentalists and absolutists who willingly commit sins against their god in a misguided belief that they have been forced to sin in order to do their almighty’s will.

Second, the program defined science and theory in clear terms and acknowledged that those who would wrest power from a benign group of biologists must muddy the lexical waters in order to claim parity. Hence, in Newspeak, “science” and “theory” are fluid terms and the meanings that have been ascribed by generations of academics have been lost. It’s clear to me that certain sectors in society have long associated and will forever associate the current conception of religion with “good” and the current conception of science with “bad.” So, any program that poignantly exposes this lexical mischief should be celebrated.

Third and finally, the findings prove that an impartial observer, one who is an expert on neither religion nor science but the law, will correctly determine the outcome of the aforementioned debate using a rational and scholarly method. As though a judge should ensure that both parties leave the courtroom fairly content and partially hopeful, one of the chief complaints about Jones’ ruling that Intelligent Design is not science and that it is the “progeny of creationism” is that he goes “too far.” You take these criticisms to heart, I know. Unfortunately, a judgment declaring Intelligent Design science and irreducible complexity valid is the only action about which the Intelligent Design advocates could have experienced even a modicum of contentment.

As for the content, I do agree that, when viewed with an “Intelligent Design has achieved parity” mindset, the program is one-sided. If the judge had ruled that Intelligent Design surpasses evolution as both a science and a theory and the producers had decided to allot equal time to both, Intelligent Design advocates would mindlessly squawk on-and-on about how the equal time subverts the truth and about how “Darwinists” are losers. On the other hand, an honest assessment would conclude that the program’s intended purpose, to explain how the judge reached his decision and to present a summary of the aftermath, was readily achieved.

Now, onto the meat of your email, your invocation of Sam Harris is interesting. I almost fully disagree with his infamous “Science Must Destroy Religion” essay. Religion will exist as long as “misery” and “suffering” reside in our vocabulary. Atheism offers neither hope nor comfort to those who believe that life is truly awful. Aside from offering the wonderful and individually-conceptualized reward of soulful bliss, religion offers a code of conduct that prescribes the actions one must undertake in order to achieve personal satisfaction through the bringing of happiness and safety to others. Current fundamentalists and absolutists passionately believe that misery and suffering will never be eradicated unless secularism and its precepts are eradicated.

In this regard, religion is extremely influential. It is its pinnacle of economic acridity. Thousands of people, who misguidedly believe that their contributions will bestow great blessings upon them, tithe daily. Though I cannot refute Harris’ central thesis that an investment in science will provide more tangible blessings to more people, the placebo effect that is produced by acting upon faith remains valid.

Subsequently and throughout history, the moods and behaviors of a people within a state have been determined by the leaders of the state’s foremost religion. Constantine chose religion in order to consolidate his power amongst his people for this very reason. The encouraging news about this religion-as-institution condition is that Christianity and Islam arose from within. Religion-as-institution naturally produces misery and suffering and its inevitable outcome is the production of its most subversive element–the one that must precede orthodoxical revolution–contra-interpretation.

In this phase of American history, religion-as-institution is, overwhelmingly, the most favored governmental paradigm and, subsequently, “war is peace” is the most favored foreign policy. Soft war (dissemination of misinformation and the beginnings of economic sanctions) with Iran has already begun. And, because, like Constantine, the current President of the United States sees no distinction between the resources of his state, the resources of his will to do good, and the resources of his god, hard war with Iran is likely. Congress and the people lack the will to stop this because that which will be lost by becoming subversive far exceeds that which will be lost by espousing modern jingoistic ideals.

Those who are of a legitimately “cool” disposition will likely arise from within this religion-as-institution fire. From my experience with the Catholic Church, the most caring and personable priests have atheistic tendencies. When the Church causes misery and suffering, those priests who have maintained enough of a distance from the dogma can compensate those who find themselves disenfranchised.

To wit, all I am able to do now is speculate upon those events that will produce a critical mass of those subversive elements necessary for orthodoxical revolution. An external effect such as terrorism does not produce an immediate result. Likewise, an internal effect such as the bad decision that an agent of the state will make in response to an external threat does not produce an immediate result. It is a slow bleed and the vocal minority can only grow over time. I do believe that a hard war with Iran will substantially speed up this process. However, boiling the water too quickly can cause the people to accept a 1% token while the state retains 99% of its former self. Still, it is a loss and, I conclude, let the state expend its resources and continue its self-destruction because that 1% may be the largest return to the people that I will see in my lifetime.

November 14, 2007 is a date I’ll likely forget in the near future as I’m not one for counting days. But, on that day, I formally quit smoking. I began Chantix at the end of October and, so far, the withdrawal symptoms have yet to be as severe as they could be. Instead of an amped testosterone level, I’ve been as mellow as I could hope for while feeling like shit. Some of my more unpleasant symptoms include an occasional and complete inability to pay attention, nausea, a loud heartbeat, trouble falling and staying asleep, and the ability to smell my nearby trash can.

Reading through the “quit smoking now!” literature, it seems I will have to wait up to a year to experience a full sensory return. Unfortunately, that’s not very encouraging news. I want encouragement and a good reason to stay quit now. But, going with the flow is a must. Upon reflection, I’m simply amazed that a chemical can exert so much control over an entire life and how much hell a body can raise when you change your mind. But, though being quit doesn’t encourage remaining quit and though I’ve had no “real” reason to quit because smoking is a habit that I fully enjoyed, I don’t picture myself returning. Even when I quit cold turkey in the past, I’ve never become the desperate and whiny sort of quitter who prattles on endlessly about willpower and their lack thereof.

But, it’s day 2 and the seas will only get rockier over the next few weeks…

Ambiance (1)
Artist Spotlight (2)
Book Reviews (1)
Bug of the Day (1)
Comment of the Day (7)
Culture (19)
Deep Thoughts (1)
Dumb America (9)
Economics (6)
Election '08 (46)
Election Day Sights (7)
Evening Conversation Series (1)
Face of the Day (1)
George Likes Squirrels (33)
Important Thoughts on Holidays (3)
In Frame (3)
In the News (4)
In Their Own Words (4)
Internet Stuff (3)
Literaricals (1)
Movie Reviews (2)
Music (1)
Music of '08 (7)
My Research (3)
Occupation of Iraq (4)
Otherwise (24)
Police State (1)
Politics (27)
Post-Concession (1)
Psychology (9)
Quote of the Day (7)
Religion (17)
Sunday Funnies (4)
Tech Reviews (4)
Technology (4)
Television (3)
That Time I Quit Smoking (5)
Travels (1)
Wordpress Stuff (1)

WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.